A Shot at Metaphysical Terms

Essence, Substance, and Form

Photo by Michael Dziedzic

Metaphysics can be concerned with things so basic that it’s hard to understand, and the language only makes it harder. The hope here is to provide a quick guide to help with key terms: “essence,” “substance,” and “form.”

Different thinkers seem to use these terms in different ways, and someone like Aristotle strikes me as using them like similes one moment, only to use them like they are incredibly distinct the next. A true scholar of Aristotle could easily perceive distinctions I cannot, but my hope is to still provide a general guide. If it is useless or too incomplete to be of value, please disregard it.

So, for my take on the terms:

Essence is what makes a thing that particular thing. In other words, essence is what makes “that chair.”

Substance is what makes a thing a general thing. In other words, substance is what makes “a chair.”

Form is what makes the idea of a thing, without which the thing would not be intelligible. In other words, form is what makes “that idea of a/that chair.

These terms can be unified in one phenomenon and distinct in another, so there are times when the categories overlap, making them seem identical. Something with essence also has substance and form, and since everything is a particular thing in the world, everything in the world entails all three categories.

A thought experiment that might help:

Imagine I am cloned. My clone will have my substance and form, but it will not have my essence. Now imagine my clone tells you that it is a clone; suddenly, the clone will have my substance, but not my form. Thus, my clone never has my essence, has my form contingently, and always has my substance.

And there we go! I hope this helps us get a grip on some famously confusing terms. That said, the brilliant Thomas Jockin pointed out a need for distinctions between “particular” and “individuated,” and also brought to my attention the useful scholastic term haecceity, which I encourage readers to investigate. Distinctions should also be made between “primary substances” and “secondary substances,” and in some metaphysical schemas, my clone and I share the same essence while being different primary substances. In my work, “essence” and “primary substance” are used similarly, and that could easily be a mistake. Still, I think the distinctions I laid out are useful (at least somewhat) even if incomplete, and perhaps I should just use the letters A, B, and C to signify the distinctions versus risk using metaphysically rich concepts wrongly. If I have made mistakes, please extend me your forgiveness.

.

.

.

For more, please visit O.G. Rose.com. Also, please subscribe to our YouTube channel and follow us on Instagram and Facebook.

--

--

--

Iowa. Broken Pencil. Allegory. Write Launch. Ponder. Pidgeonholes. W&M. Poydras. Toho. ellipsis. O:JA&L. West Trade. UNO. Pushcart. https://linktr.ee/ogrose

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Daily Stoicism| A 30-Day Challenge to Change Your Life

The Story of Space: Aristotle’s Container View Of Space

Action cannot go without theory never ever it will be able to do it

Future Perfect: On the uses, abuses, and paradoxes of speculative futures

“The World Inhospitable to Pilgrims” On Zygmunt Bauman’s From Pilgrim to Tourist

SURGERY FROM STARK UPDATING : DEFINITION _ VOLUME ONE — PART. TEN

Weekly Journal 2/13

Falling from the shoulders of giants

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
O.G. Rose

O.G. Rose

Iowa. Broken Pencil. Allegory. Write Launch. Ponder. Pidgeonholes. W&M. Poydras. Toho. ellipsis. O:JA&L. West Trade. UNO. Pushcart. https://linktr.ee/ogrose

More from Medium

The Fire of Learners

Theory of Bloom — An Interpretation

A Libidinal Exploration of Metaphysics and Cosmology Through Cormac Mcarthy’s Blood Meridian