From Section V.2E of II.1 (“The Problem of Scale (Part I)”)

On Demand (Part 3, Endnotes 376–377)

O.G. Rose
1 min readSep 25, 2023

Considering “The General Theory” of Lord Keynes

Photo by Troy Mortier

³⁷⁶Having discussed the conflation of “the money multiplier” with “the investment multiplier,” let us now address another common accusation, that Keynes was a Socialist and/or a Marxist, which will return us to “the multiplier question” (which I think the views of Keynes on that subject are critical to grasp if we are to understand why he is ultimately a Capitalist). To this point, at the end of Chapter 12, Keynes says something of interest that can help illuminate why we shouldn’t use the term “Keynesianism” as a blank term for all government spending (though I myself am guilty of making this mistake). Keynes writes…

.

.

.

For the full piece, which is on Substack due to formatting issues, please see:

--

--

O.G. Rose

Iowa. Broken Pencil. Allegory. Write Launch. Ponder. Pidgeonholes. W&M. Poydras. Toho. ellipsis. O:JA&L. West Trade. UNO. Pushcart. https://linktr.ee/ogrose